Showing posts with label obama. Show all posts
Showing posts with label obama. Show all posts

Saturday, February 21, 2009

U.S. financial regulators will soon launch a series of "stress tests"


U.S. financial regulators to determine which of the largest banks may need additional capital cushions if recession deepens.
largest U.S. banks should get bigger capital cushions in the event of a deeper recession, a person familiar with Obama administration plans said Saturday.
Banks are expected to receive additional information about the tests in the coming week from regulators.

The largest U.S. banks are "well capitalized" for current conditions, the source said, but the Obama administration wants to ensure that they can withstand a more severe economic climate and can play an important role in maintaining the flow of credit.
Initial plans for the stress tests were announced Feb. 10 as part of Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner's bank stabilization plan, but the source Saturday for the first time linked the tests to additional government support for large banks. This person did not specify what form any extra capital cushion may take.

Little is known about the form of the stress tests, but the person described them as "consistent, forward looking and conservative."

The Obama administration on Friday tried to ease market fears that the government was poised to nationalize some large banks that are continuing to struggle with losses and a lack of confidence, notably Citigroup and Bank of America.

White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said Friday that "this administration continues to strongly believe that a privately held banking system is the correct way to go

Saturday, January 10, 2009

Obama wants access to remaining bailout money

Barack Obama's economic team is talking with the Bush administration about having Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson ask Congress within the next week for access to the $350 billion remaining in the financial bailout fund, officials on both sides said Friday.

A request by Paulson would allow Obama to begin tapping the fund — the last half of a $700 billion rescue package authorized by Congress in October — promptly after his Jan. 20 inauguration.

Obama's transition team also has asked Neel Kashkari, the head of the rescue program at the Treasury Department, to stay on for "a couple of weeks" under the new Obama administration to ensure a smooth transition, an Obama official said.

Paulson has said for a number of weeks that he has been having talks with the Obama team on when a request should be presented to Congress seeking the second $350 billion. He has said that the decision on timing has been left up to the incoming administration.

Eager to shift the course of the government's financial sector bailout fund, Obama and congressional Democrats want a more defined mission for the beleaguered $700 billion rescue program.

The House could act as early as next week on a new tack for the Troubled Asset Relief Program that would set tougher conditions on recipients of the money, including limits on executive pay, and require the Treasury Department to use some of the money to reduce mortgage foreclosures.

At the same time, Obama's selection for treasury secretary, Timothy Geithner, is broadening the program's goals, aiming to unfreeze credit for homeowners, consumers, small businesses and local governments.

Geithner and Obama's economic team are developing a "comprehensive set of investment principles" that would also embrace restrictions on how the money is spent, limits on executive compensation for fund recipients and a plan to address rising foreclosures, an Obama transition official said.

The changes come amid bipartisan criticism that the Bush administration's handling of the first $350 billion of the program has been unfocused, confusing and inconsistent. But the new approach also signals a significantly greater government intrusion into the workings of financial institutions than the Bush administration was willing to undertake.

The money so far has been used to support ailing companies such as insurance giant American International Group Inc. and automakers General Motors Corp. and Chrysler LLC. It also has pumped billions of dollars into banks in hopes of freeing up credit for loans. But critics have complained that the money has had few strings attached and has not been used effectively to address the nation's housing cris